Galatians 1:1-12, Paul’s most fundamental anti-Roman cryptogram

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
FransJVermeiren
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:14 am
Contact:

Galatians 1:1-12, Paul’s most fundamental anti-Roman cryptogram

Post by FransJVermeiren » Sat Aug 24, 2019 10:25 am

In his book Anti-Roman Cryptograms in the New Testament – Symbolic Messages of Hope and Liberation Norman A. Beck devotes a chapter to Paul’s use of anti-Roman cryptograms. In that chapter Beck does not discuss Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Below I analyse Galatians 1:1-12, which in my opinion is fully devoted to the struggle between Paul’s gospel of the Christ and the opposing gospel of Roman imperial ideology. Paul has encrypted this text for safety reasons.

Text
The Nestle-Aland translation of this fragment goes as follows (my subdivision):

(1) From Paul, apostle not from men nor through man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead. (2) And from all the brethren who are with me, to the churches of Galatia: (3) Grace to you and peace from God our Father and our Lord Jesus Christ.
(4) Who gave himself for our sins to deliver us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father; (5) whom be the glory for ever and ever. Amen.
(6) I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ* and turning to a different gospel.
(7)Not that there is another gospel, but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of the Christ.
(8) But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach you a gospel contrary to that which we preached to you, let him be accursed.
(9) As we have said before, so now I say again, if any one is preaching to you a gospel contrary to that which you received, let him be accursed.
(10) Am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still pleasing men, I should not be a servant of the Christ.
(11) For I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not man’s gospel. (12) For I did not receive it from man, nor was I taught it, but it came through a revelation of Jesus Christ.

Discussion
The Essene activist Paul lived and worked in the eastern part of the Roman empire, and throughout his letters several coded anti-Roman messages can be uncovered, as Beck has shown. From the first verse of his letter to the Galatians, Paul establishes a supreme ruler opposition between God and Jesus Christ on one side, and ‘men’ and ‘man’ on the other.
When Paul opposes God and men/man, he seems to make a sharp distinction between the true and only God of the Jews and certain human beings. The humans who most of all qualify as God’s opponents are humans who are undeservedly worshipped as gods. The humans to whom Paul in all probability refers in this context are the Roman emperors.

‘To deliver us from the present evil age’ in verse 4 is a possible translation, encouraged by a textual variant. The majority of the texts however gives ἐκ τοῦ αἰῶνος τοῦ ἐνεστῶτος πονηροῦ, which can be translated as ‘from the age of the present evil’ as well as ‘from the age of the present evil one’, considering πονηρός as a noun instead of an adjective, as is frequently the case elsewhere in the New Testament (see BDAG p. 851). In an era dominated by the Romans, it is obvious who this evil one would be.

In line with the opposition between ‘God and Christ’ on one side and the Roman emperors on the other, in verse 6 follows the opposition between Paul’s gospel and an alternative gospel, the gospel of Roman imperial ideology. To Paul’s disappointment, this rival gospel seems to have attracted a part of his audience.

In verse 8 Paul shows his deep aversion towards this rival ‘good news’ of Roman imperial ideology and those who proclaim it.

In verse 10 Paul diametrically opposes ‘seeking the favour of men’ (the Roman emperors) and ‘seeking the favour of God’, and similarly ‘pleasing men’ (idem) and ‘to be a servant of the Christ’. Paul sees himself as the propagator of the κύριος Χριστός (kurios Christos) against the dominant ideology of the κύριος Καῖσαρ (kurios Caesar).
In verse 11 Paul says that ‘the gospel which was preached by me is not man’s gospel’. By ‘man’s gospel’ he refers to the all too human gospel of the divinized Roman emperor. Paul on the contrary received the truly divine gospel of the Jewish/Essene Christ through a revelation.

Traditionally the opposing gospel in this chapter is explained as a rival Jewish or Christian gospel. I believe this is contradicted by the fact that Paul does not discuss any detail of the content of his own or the opposing gospel. When the other gospel were Jewish or Christian, there would have been no obstacle to discuss concrete points of controversy. The Roman authorities remained aloof from internal Jewish affairs, as Gallio’s viewpoint in Acts 18:12-17 shows. Avoiding the discussion of concrete points of contention indicates that Paul aimed at Roman imperial ideology and at the same time feared the Roman authorities. In Galatians 1 Paul is sketching the clash between two politicoreligious worldviews. In a world dominated by the Romans it was way too dangerous for Paul to overtly attack the gospel of the blessings that according to Roman propaganda the divinized Roman emperor bestowed on his subjects. For Paul’s informed audience this concealed attack on Roman imperial ideology was clear enough.

I believe that my identification of the man/men in Galatians 1 as the Roman emperor(s) and of the gospel opposed to Paul’s as Roman imperial ideology is an important addition to Beck’s overview of anti-Roman cryptograms in Paul’s letters.

* Nestle-Aland considers this ‘Christ’ to be ‘of doubtful authenticity’. Some manuscripts give θεός (‘God’).
Last edited by FransJVermeiren on Sat Aug 31, 2019 1:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
www.waroriginsofchristianity.com

The practical modes of concealment are limited only by the imaginative capacity of subordinates. James C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance.

User avatar
Joseph D. L.
Posts: 1174
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 2:10 am

Re: Galatians 1:1-12, Paul’s most fundamental anti-Roman cryptogram

Post by Joseph D. L. » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:27 pm

Paul an Essene? No way in h.e.l.l.

User avatar
Joseph D. L.
Posts: 1174
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 2:10 am

Re: Galatians 1:1-12, Paul’s most fundamental anti-Roman cryptogram

Post by Joseph D. L. » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:29 pm

You're taking chapter one out of context. It's clear based on chapter two that those of whom he is speaking against are the men from James, i.e. Essenes.

FransJVermeiren
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:14 am
Contact:

Re: Galatians 1:1-12, Paul’s most fundamental anti-Roman cryptogram

Post by FransJVermeiren » Sun Aug 25, 2019 10:55 am

That an earlier chapter would be dependent on a later is not an obvious viewpoint in itself.

In my opinion nothing in my analysis of Galatians 1:1-12 contradicts the rest of the first and the whole second chapter. As said above, Galatians 1:1-12 is fully devoted to the opposition between two gospels, and nothing points in the direction of an alternative Jewish, Essene or Christian gospel.

In the rest of chapter one Paul describes the start and the first part of his messianistic career, and his first visit to Jerusalem where he met Cephas and James.

Chapter two starts with his second journey to Jerusalem. The ψευδαδέλφοι of verse 4 are not members of a rival Essene faction but external spies, probably gathering information for the collaborating Sadducees. That Paul is fighting against collaborators becomes clear not only from his denigrating description of these opponents (‘those who were reputed to be something’) but more importantly from his use of a core argument against the imperial cult: πρόσωπον [ὁ] θεὸς ἀνθρώπου οὐ λαμβάνει, God does not take the countenance of man, i.e. of the Roman emperor.

Paul emphasizes that there was an agreement about the division of tasks between the Essene leaders: Paul would turn to the gentiles while James, Cephas and John were the leading triumvirate of the Jewish Essenes.

There is indeed the eating incident in Antioch, but this has nothing to do with an alternative gospel but only with the scope of the messianic project. That is what Paul means with ‘the truth of the gospel’: the messianic project is not only open for the Jews but for the gentiles as well. The content of the Essene gospel remains one and the same: liberation from the Romans and their abhorred gospel.
www.waroriginsofchristianity.com

The practical modes of concealment are limited only by the imaginative capacity of subordinates. James C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance.

User avatar
Joseph D. L.
Posts: 1174
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 2:10 am

Re: Galatians 1:1-12, Paul’s most fundamental anti-Roman cryptogram

Post by Joseph D. L. » Sun Aug 25, 2019 12:59 pm

I don't even believe the letter(s) were originally divided into chapters, and thus should be read in a homogeneous context.

Galatians is specifically addressing Jewish opponents to his career, which is why he is referring to his meeting with Cephas and James, to give legitimacy to himself, but later addresses Cephas' hypocrisy and his own opposition to James, indicating that he does not depend upon them, and does not support them.

Paul is not an Essene, nor is he arguing on behalf of them. And he is pro-Rome.

An Essene gospel? Maybe the Gospels of the Hebrews and Ebionites.

FJVermeiren
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:48 am
Contact:

Re: Galatians 1:1-12, Paul’s most fundamental anti-Roman cryptogram

Post by FJVermeiren » Mon Aug 26, 2019 12:43 am

In Hidden Transcripts and the Arts of Resistance - Applying the Work of James C. Scott to Jesus and Paul Neil Elliott discusses Strategies of Resistance and Hidden Transcripts in the Pauline Communities (p. 97-122).

Supported by recent scholarship Elliott shows that Paul built his communities as a counterforce against the dominant patronage system. Elliott speaks of an egalitarian practice of mutuality in deliberate contradiction of the prevalent ideology and iconography of Roman power. (p. 102)

Paul's messianistic project is fully anti-Roman. Elliot's essay adds a supplementary piece of evidence to this.
www.waroriginsofchristianity.com

The practical modes of concealment are limited only by the imaginative capacity of subordinates.
James C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance p. 139

User avatar
Joseph D. L.
Posts: 1174
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 2:10 am

Re: Galatians 1:1-12, Paul’s most fundamental anti-Roman cryptogram

Post by Joseph D. L. » Tue Aug 27, 2019 1:09 am

I haven't read this (or heard of it) but everything points to Paul being pro-Rome, and possibly an agent of the Empire, and antiJudaism, or at least a heavy reform Judaism.

Post Reply