Re: Shapira NOT a Forgery
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:14 am
Idan Dershowitz and Na'ama Pat-El have responded to Benjamin Suchard's paper:
https://www.academia.edu/47094146/Respo ... bal_system_
B. Suchard has given some preliminary rebuttal to the rebuttal, pending a longer publication.
https://twitter.com/bnuyaminim/status/1 ... 3117081600
And Suchard clarified in comments at "academia.edu" (should de facto be dot com?) that he asserts that he has shown that "V" is not proto- or pre- Deut. but that his evidence for a 19th-century forgery is relatively less strong.
So far, fwiw, though others may know better, I find Suchard's case the stronger one.
https://www.academia.edu/47094146/Respo ... bal_system_
B. Suchard has given some preliminary rebuttal to the rebuttal, pending a longer publication.
https://twitter.com/bnuyaminim/status/1 ... 3117081600
And Suchard clarified in comments at "academia.edu" (should de facto be dot com?) that he asserts that he has shown that "V" is not proto- or pre- Deut. but that his evidence for a 19th-century forgery is relatively less strong.
So far, fwiw, though others may know better, I find Suchard's case the stronger one.