My comments here started because you made an inane comment about about Hillel's supposed Babylonian origin in the original post, in addition to the peculiar title. I didn't mention previously that the historicity of Ezra is also highly doubtful.
It looked like the thread was going to analyze the Jewish presence in Babylonia between the exile and the completion (or whatever) of the Iranian Talmud. So I made the relevant point that there are problems with a long term Jewish presence in the area during that time period.
After my reply you moved the focus to the Babylonian exile, without making any noticeable improvements in the stuff you posted. Throughout all of this, you haven't even made a single interesting point. You seem to lack any kind of adult critical judgment.
Sorry if my criticism has been too harsh for you.
Regarding your feeble 6th century BCE population of Judah population posts -
Finkelstein gives the combined population if Israel and Judah as 400,000 in the eighth century BCE, before the Assyrians crushed Israel.
The Baylonian exile wiki gives this, which you mention above.
Archaeological excavations and surveys have enabled the population of Judah before the Babylonian destruction to be calculated with a high degree of confidence to have been approximately 75,000.
That's just a good number, the Talk section of the wiki becomes contentious but nobody is bitching about the correctness of this.
...Taking the different biblical numbers of exiles at their highest, 20,000, this would mean that at most 25% of the population had been deported to Babylon, with the remaining 75% staying in Judah.
Your quote of Weinberg in your last post is cherry picked. His estimate is wrong. How could the population of the area stay the same between the 8th and 6th centuries with all the shit going down? It's not really his fault because he's heavily relying heavily on the Bible (and the guys who actually read it) as opposed to archaeology. You ignore his discussion of the number of people involved in the exile, where he likes 12 to 14,000. The exile appears to have been quite comfortable, if the Babylonians didn't want slaves why would they go through that expense, all the exiles seem to have they wound up on welfare.
Personally, I commented on the 20,000 number because biblical numbers like this are almost always ridiculously high (and I'm not sure about the almost).
I think the technical problem is that there are more people coming back from the exile than actually left, so we have a lot of singing and dancing., similar to the Laurel and Hardy routine about the how to make the exile come out to 70 years - guess your research hasn't got that far yet.
Hope that the tax cut gives you enough money to buy your own computer.