Ethan you clearly shown that Hebrew is Greek but this is not a contest .
Just as the Torah is a plagerised version of Old Greek OT (which was the one the Apostles & Christ preached with ) but
the entire language ... and the " With a Mask " describes their approach until the second coming .
Thats the Idea , so no rational ,science , linguistic or history will EEEVVVVVEEERRR make these NumbNuts change their mind .
And that I guess has to be the way else imagine everyone agreed on the truth ( religiously IMPOSSIBLE ) even non religiously .
I know many sciences & I can tell you we deceived in all ! Even the , seemingly insignificant like Geometry .
Well fact of the matter is that a PHD in Geometry is never told EVERYTHING around him ,
micro to macro respects the PHI ratio !
Why ? Cause he's not suppose to know or pay attention to it .
Cause we not suppose to , point being .... we not suppose to know everything is Greek .. like the words are ALL greek .
Or was there no name for Pyramid prior to Greeks ?
That Greek is the language of OT & NT is self evident but ignorant people , like the chap who said things like .
"No serious person will even bother reading this "
He's a twat who can't think for himself as +90% of people will not defy what the so called " Go to people of linguistic or etymology "
Propagate , the reason is simple . Because the lie starts at least 1000 BC when the Evreou .. add a H & speak the written Greek V or ancient Greek B as spoken B .. convert the eou to ew . Job done = HEBREW
Sabbath is the easiest ... I mean come on Savvato
The day of the lord .
But they
PERVERT the works as well intentionally to obscure the coming of Christ & prophesies as well as trying to make themselves look better & Greeks worse .... it's prevailed of millennia .
Amos 5:26 (Hebrew text):
‘And will actually carry Sukkuth your king, and Kaiwan, your images, the star of your god, whom you made for yourselves.’
Amos 5:26 (Septuagint):
‘But then you chose Molech’s tent
And the star of Raiphan as your gods…
You made idols of them for yourselves!’
And wherever God or His spokesman was speaking in the books of the Prophets, the words were also spoken poetically IN GREEK you read it as such not in hebrew
And the Evreou . wide spread people Greeks with a Mask on ... they are deceivers ! And the good Jew became a Christian
Jesus & everyone for that matter preached from the Greek OT and Septuagint is a perversion of the Greek OT ... by who again ?
The soulless Babylonian Zionist Jews .
If you looked at it from a Religious point you would appreciate why they have been perverting the word of God since it was received IN GREEK
God would give the truth to a handful of people speaking a language no one understands ? OR to the entire literate world speaking .... wait for it ... GREEK !
http://www.2001translation.com/Septuagint.htm
AND THEY DESTROY THE HEBREW TEXT !
Which is the Better Text Source?
We recently read an online commentary about this Bible in which the writer called our selecting the Septuagint for its OT source as foolish. For he asked: ‘What will they do when they get to the book of Isaiah, where the text is totally different from what is found in the Hebrew text?’
In reply, we ask: ‘What about the Proverbs?’ The text there is also quite different from the Hebrew, and it makes more sense! So, which should we trust as being right?
We are currently leaning toward the Septuagint, for the natural rhythm of the Greek text in the Proverbs shows that it more closely reflects the original writing of Solomon, which was obviously done as poetry.
Also, our translating of the book of Isaiah seems to make more sense than what we find in popular Hebrew texts, and this raises the question: Could it be that this most maligned Greek text is more accurate than its Hebrew counterpart? If so, this could change the meaning of some of the most important prophecies of the Bible.
Is the Septuagint Incomplete?
We know that some Hebrew scholars claim that the Septuagint was an incomplete work and that it originally only contained the Pentateuch (Genesis through Deuteronomy). They also say that the rest of the books were a First-Century Christian fabrication, which was developed just to slander the Jews. However, we have found no words condemning Israel and the Jews that aren’t also found in the Hebrew/Aramaic texts, and since Jesus and Paul appear to have quoted other OT texts from the Septuagint, it seems clear that these claims are untrue.
Also, the fact that the majority of early First-Century Christians were Jews who are known to have had great respect for the Law and for the earlier writings that are now referred to as ‘the Old Testament,’ proves such conclusions to be illogical and unfounded.
Look at the name of this work… Septuagint (the Seventy). The reason why the ancient Jews gave it this name is because it was created by seventy Jewish scholars who translated all 37 Bible OT Bible books. And even if it were possible for such claims to be true (that the Septuagint originally only covered the Pentateuch and the remaining books were copied by Christians), the rest of the Septuagint books still represent texts that are older than any of those that are currently available to us in Hebrew, and we have no reason to trust Jewish Traditionalist scribes more than Jewish Christian scribes.
The Changes We Have Made
The fact is; in our translating, we have found numerous obvious errors in both the Greek and Hebrew texts. Some errors are just misspelled names, while others are totally wrong names. We have also found texts that are in conflict with other texts and accounts, and we have found major differences in chronology between the Hebrew and Greek texts. We can say this surely, because the errors are so obvious.
Understand that there is plenty of redundancy in the Bible, and we have many First-Century quotations of OT texts… so it is fairly easy to see where errors or insertions were made. In addition, we have two different texts to compare against each other, the Greek and the Masoretic. So, where we find differences in the texts, we have been prompted to do more research.
Understand that we haven’t made any changes in secret, for we have included extensive linked Notes that explain in detail why we have made such changes, and where people have written to disagree with the changes, we have included their comments.
You will also notice that for the purpose of helping readers who are familiar with the order found in American Protestant-religion Bibles (such as the King James Version), we have chosen the same names, order, and numbering of the books of Samuel, Kings, Chronicles, and Psalms, as they are found in their Bibles.
It is true that most current English copies of the Septuagint include the Apocryphal books. We have examined them, and though we agree that they may provide some valuable insights into Jewish history, we have concluded that they are uninspired writings, because they do not harmonize with the rest of the Bible. So, although we have a person who has volunteered to work on this for us, we have not made the project a priority.
Good work Ethan , shame people don't pay attention to what is so self evident