The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
rgprice
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:57 pm

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by rgprice »

John T wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:36 am Thank you for your honesty.

John T is done with this thread.
I'm not quite sure what you're going on about, but the info on The Testament of Amram is helpful. Thanks.
ABuddhist
Posts: 1016
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:36 am

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by ABuddhist »

rgprice wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:45 pm
John T wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:36 am Thank you for your honesty.

John T is done with this thread.
I'm not quite sure what you're going on about, but the info on The Testament of Amram is helpful. Thanks.
I think that John T is so disgusted that you would accept Gmirkin's claims as true that he is refusing to help you any more.
schillingklaus
Posts: 645
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2021 11:17 pm

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by schillingklaus »

Amran's Testament is not a reference to the serpent of Genesis 3 by any stretch. Likewise, Belial can be understood as a natural enemies of the Jews, such as Antiochos Epiphanes. It is by no means a synonym for Satan.
Ulan
Posts: 1505
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:58 am

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by Ulan »

The flood story is a good example for the point that the original stories must have put the blame mostly on the Gods. In the Mesopotamian version, it's the god Enki who teaches the chief god Enlil, who ordered the flood, a lesson. You can still find that idea in the Bible story, if you look closely, as it's God himself who afterwards declares the whole shenanigans as pointless and vows, like Enlil, never to repeat such a folly.

The Eden story also still has a similar idea at its core: It's God who expresses fear that Adam may eat from the other forbidden tree next and become like God himself. This makes the kick out of Eden rather look like an act of self-preservation for God, who doesn't like competition.
User avatar
neilgodfrey
Posts: 6162
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by neilgodfrey »

Ulan wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 4:08 am The Eden story also still has a similar idea at its core: It's God who expresses fear that Adam may eat from the other forbidden tree next and become like God himself. This makes the kick out of Eden rather look like an act of self-preservation for God, who doesn't like competition.
An interesting point raised by Gmirkin is the question of who was supposed to eat the fruit of the tree of life (and tree of knowledge of good and evil) if they were forbidden to the humans. The only other figure in the garden was Yahweh. Like the second order or later generation of Greek gods, immortality was granted through the eating divine food.
StephenGoranson
Posts: 2611
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 2:10 am

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by StephenGoranson »

If one casts a net wider than Greek texts, some other ancient cultures associated immortality with eating tree-fruit pomegranates. Others thought peaches. So not necessarily Greek.
Last edited by StephenGoranson on Tue Aug 23, 2022 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
schillingklaus
Posts: 645
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2021 11:17 pm

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by schillingklaus »

Yahweh was not the only other figure as there were the Elohim with him, who assisted already with creation.
lsayre
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 3:39 pm

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by lsayre »

Yahweh may not have had any part in initiating the creation outlined in Genesis. In Psalm 82 El declares (assigns) Yahweh to be the God over the people of Israel (after sentencing others among the Sons of God who seem to previously have held assignments such as this to death). That seems to imply that El (The white bearded Ancient of Days) is the boss, and likely the creator. And Yahweh to be merely another (or one of potentially many) among the Sons of God.

It may be that Yahweh appeared as Jesus, but it is never made explicit. It may also be that after El's purging of a number of other Sons, Yahweh was uniquely the only remaining Son. ???
rgprice
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:57 pm

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by rgprice »

StephenGoranson wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 8:00 am If one casts a net wider than Greek texts, some other ancient cultures associated immortality with eating tree-fruit pomegranates. Others thought peaches. So not necessarily Greek.
Yes, precisely. The problem I have with Gmirkin's most recent work is that it looks too narrowly at Genesis and Plato's works, while largely glossing over the tremendous amount of syncretism among the cultures of the Mediterranean and Near East, dating back to the 3rd or 4th millennium BCE. How many features in Timaeus are also shared by other myths and theogonies? I haven't done a study, but it seems like a whole lot. Many of these ideas were not at all unique to Plato and had been around since the time of the Sumerians.
Bernard Muller
Posts: 3964
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 6:02 pm
Contact:

Re: The relationship between Genesis and apocryphal accounts...

Post by Bernard Muller »

4) Earl Doherty and Richard Carrier have made much of the role of the "Martyrdom and Ascension of Isaiah" in their reconstructions of Christian origins.
See http://historical-jesus.info/100.html Another look at the 'Ascension of Isaiah', the "gospel" of Dr. Carrier in OHJ

Cordially, Bernard
Post Reply