did you know???
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2021 5:12 pm
Did you know:
1. That the name Jesus (Iesous) was made by Justin Martyr (150-165) and that before that it was Isu? (Paul was forged by the church).
2. That the title Christus did not appear in the NT until after 450 AD, I don't know when. And that before it was Chrestos. (Paul was forged again).
That everything you read about Christ, or Christians, maybe oral but is not in the NT. That any connection between "Christ" and "Messiah" comes from after 450, and is made by the catholic church on purpose.
That a messiah is a warrior who has an army and fights against the romans, and when he has succeeded becomes king.
That you only have to read one gospel to see that Jesus was not.
That any other explanation (from the OT) comes from the catholic church.
That a dead messiah-claimant will never be called messiah or Christ again by the jews (like Josephus: James the brother of Jesus called Christ (deceased) is thus impossible and a forgery).
That chrestos not only means "good", but in connection to a god means "saviour". That means that Paul's Isu is a god, who is a saviour. That makes it clear that Paul is not in Turkey and Greece preaching a jewish messiah. They would not know what that is, and as can be seen there has not been a messiah in Judea.
3. That in the whole NT including Paul the word is "stauros" meaning stake, and not cross. That the word cross (and crucify and crucifixion) comes from after 400. When the bible was translated from greek into latin, stauros became crux. Crux means by the way also stake. So the translator did nothing wrong. The catholic church made cross from it with all the consequences until today.
So Paul did not write: Jesus Christ died on a cross, but Isu Chrestos died on a stake.
4. That Paul NEVER used the word church. I guess he even did not know what that was. Paul wrote "ekklesia", what for anybody who would care to look it up, means nothing more than a meeting of people. Maybe a community if they live close to one another. That is all.
When the church of rome tried to take over from Marcion because he had the gnostic god who was for the universe, and they had Jahweh who created only heaven and earth, there were still all the gnostic communities from Paul, whose letters they had taken and forged. A church, which is a building with a hierarchical organisation, is not an ekklesia. Solution from the catholic church (I could not believe it): they changed their name from church in ekklesia. In that way they incorporated all Paul's communities. And because everybody knew they were the church, all ekklesia's from then on were called or translated with church. So the church grew enormously.
So there was no church in Jerusalem, or even a bishop of Jerusalem at all. The eastern church was in the beginning Paul's communities. If you can read greek, you can see that stauros simply gets translated with cross, and ekklesia with church. Also today. We are not allowed to know that in the east were only communities, and that Isu/Jesus died on a stake. That was the roman death penalty, and I found out how it was done. And I can tell you that there was no blood.
So, it is just a few words. Is it? It looks like a different world. The name was changed, saviour was changed in messiah, stake was changed in cross, and ekklesia in church. Rather important forgeries. Paul was the first writer, he started a religion, and he did that roughly between 90 and 120 (the original movement started after 70 in Judea, and was not talking about the son of god. They were NOT starting a religion or a cult).
Before all the shouting starts: most if not all biblical scholars do not even know this. Their bible and their knowledge are recent. They have no idea at all. They are typically not studying ancient history like I do. Nobody does. It is all difficult to find. But it is dug up now. Hopefully it stays up.
The church is still called ekklesia, in Italy, Spain, Portugal and France.
The Germanic languages (church, kerk, kirk, Kirche) come from the original, which was "Oikia Kyriake", greek for "house of the Lord". The Lord being Jahweh, and being a building. It is the same as temple.
greetings, Cora.
1. That the name Jesus (Iesous) was made by Justin Martyr (150-165) and that before that it was Isu? (Paul was forged by the church).
2. That the title Christus did not appear in the NT until after 450 AD, I don't know when. And that before it was Chrestos. (Paul was forged again).
That everything you read about Christ, or Christians, maybe oral but is not in the NT. That any connection between "Christ" and "Messiah" comes from after 450, and is made by the catholic church on purpose.
That a messiah is a warrior who has an army and fights against the romans, and when he has succeeded becomes king.
That you only have to read one gospel to see that Jesus was not.
That any other explanation (from the OT) comes from the catholic church.
That a dead messiah-claimant will never be called messiah or Christ again by the jews (like Josephus: James the brother of Jesus called Christ (deceased) is thus impossible and a forgery).
That chrestos not only means "good", but in connection to a god means "saviour". That means that Paul's Isu is a god, who is a saviour. That makes it clear that Paul is not in Turkey and Greece preaching a jewish messiah. They would not know what that is, and as can be seen there has not been a messiah in Judea.
3. That in the whole NT including Paul the word is "stauros" meaning stake, and not cross. That the word cross (and crucify and crucifixion) comes from after 400. When the bible was translated from greek into latin, stauros became crux. Crux means by the way also stake. So the translator did nothing wrong. The catholic church made cross from it with all the consequences until today.
So Paul did not write: Jesus Christ died on a cross, but Isu Chrestos died on a stake.
4. That Paul NEVER used the word church. I guess he even did not know what that was. Paul wrote "ekklesia", what for anybody who would care to look it up, means nothing more than a meeting of people. Maybe a community if they live close to one another. That is all.
When the church of rome tried to take over from Marcion because he had the gnostic god who was for the universe, and they had Jahweh who created only heaven and earth, there were still all the gnostic communities from Paul, whose letters they had taken and forged. A church, which is a building with a hierarchical organisation, is not an ekklesia. Solution from the catholic church (I could not believe it): they changed their name from church in ekklesia. In that way they incorporated all Paul's communities. And because everybody knew they were the church, all ekklesia's from then on were called or translated with church. So the church grew enormously.
So there was no church in Jerusalem, or even a bishop of Jerusalem at all. The eastern church was in the beginning Paul's communities. If you can read greek, you can see that stauros simply gets translated with cross, and ekklesia with church. Also today. We are not allowed to know that in the east were only communities, and that Isu/Jesus died on a stake. That was the roman death penalty, and I found out how it was done. And I can tell you that there was no blood.
So, it is just a few words. Is it? It looks like a different world. The name was changed, saviour was changed in messiah, stake was changed in cross, and ekklesia in church. Rather important forgeries. Paul was the first writer, he started a religion, and he did that roughly between 90 and 120 (the original movement started after 70 in Judea, and was not talking about the son of god. They were NOT starting a religion or a cult).
Before all the shouting starts: most if not all biblical scholars do not even know this. Their bible and their knowledge are recent. They have no idea at all. They are typically not studying ancient history like I do. Nobody does. It is all difficult to find. But it is dug up now. Hopefully it stays up.
The church is still called ekklesia, in Italy, Spain, Portugal and France.
The Germanic languages (church, kerk, kirk, Kirche) come from the original, which was "Oikia Kyriake", greek for "house of the Lord". The Lord being Jahweh, and being a building. It is the same as temple.
greetings, Cora.