theios aner

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
perseusomega9
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:19 am

theios aner

Post by perseusomega9 »

I've been reading Wheeden's Mark Traditions in Conflict in which he argues that Mark was arguing against his opponents theios aner (divine man) concept of Jesus. It's a truly fascinating book but I've read hints that the presuppositions that Wheeden brought to it, and the concept of theios aner in Christianity in general, have been significantly challenged. Can anyone point me to any of those substantive critiques, whether against Wheeden's thesis itself or the theios aner concept? Are there significant challenges or is it the old conservative angle that anything new and riveting in NT studies is squashed by the conservative inertia in biblical studies? (edit: obviously last question second part tongue in cheek rhetorical :roll: )
Last edited by perseusomega9 on Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Secret Alias
Posts: 18755
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: theios aner

Post by Secret Alias »

= ish-Elohim, or ish ha'Elohim. You know what I think.
andrewcriddle
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:36 am

Re: theios aner

Post by andrewcriddle »

See TA and the Markan Miracle Tradition by Blackburn.

Andrew Criddle
perseusomega9
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:19 am

Re: theios aner

Post by perseusomega9 »

:cheers:

thank you Andrew, not only did you provide a source but the whole package!
perseusomega9
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:19 am

Re: theios aner

Post by perseusomega9 »

also, before I read this, would you say the response in this book is the best and/or closely understood position on Wheedens' book or the theios aner understanding?
User avatar
DCHindley
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:53 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: theios aner

Post by DCHindley »

perseusomega9 wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2021 11:32 am also, before I read this, would you say the response in this book is the best and/or closely understood position on W[h]eedens' book or the theios aner understanding.
It was discussed quite a bit on the old Crosstalk2 Yahoo Group (late 1980s to early 90s), which might still have searchable posts. What Yahoo did was delete the private file content, not threads or posts. The Wayback Machine might have archived the discussions.

Weeden (not Wheeden) was largely critical of Kenneth Bailey's theory of informal group control over the passing of oral tradition. But he was also interested in the "Divine Man" model for explaining the high Christology of the gospel of Mark. IIRC, he found some value in the Divine Man concept, drawing parallels with how Philostratus portrayed Apollonius of Tyana.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loeb_Clas ... ilostratus

L016) Life of Apollonius of Tyana: Volume I. Books 1–5
L017) Life of Apollonius of Tyana: Volume II. Books 6–8. Epistles of Apollonius. Eusebius: Treatise
L458) Life of Apollonius of Tyana: Volume III. Letters of Apollonius, Ancient Testimonia, Eusebius′s Reply to Hierocles
L134) Lives of the Sophists. Eunapius: Lives of the Philosophers and Sophists

Weeden's article is not free, but used copies of the book in which it is contained run around US $10-$20.

To see an analysis of Weeden's ideas, see:

https://vridar.org/tag/theodore-weeden/

DCH
Last edited by DCHindley on Sun Jan 24, 2021 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
perseusomega9
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:19 am

Re: theios aner

Post by perseusomega9 »

DCHindley wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:58 pm

Weeden (not Wheeden)
lol, this is what happens when you're a scifi fan and Whedon/Wheaton are constant spellings in your head and you're not looking at the book as you type.
Post Reply