He admits there is zero archaeological evidence for Jesus and no first-century writings about him (outside the bible). He accepts the Josephus passage as a forgery.
He says the lack of evidence for Jesus outside the bible is according to God’s plan: God wanted it this way, so that the only record of Jesus in the first century was the divine record. If people want to learn about Jesus, God wants them to learn from the proper holy source and none other.
Ok, but he has seen right on the Testimonia Flaviana.
This only fact would make him better than a person who is not a fundamentalist, etc but believes blindly in the partial authenticity of the Testimonia Flaviana.