Journal of the Jesus Movement in its Jewish Setting...

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 2:10 am

Journal of the Jesus Movement in its Jewish Setting...

Post by StephenGoranson » Sun Aug 04, 2019 12:22 am

...2019 issue is now available here:

Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:48 am

Re: Journal of the Jesus Movement in its Jewish Setting...

Post by FJVermeiren » Wed Aug 14, 2019 12:30 am

Thank you SG for drawing attention to the latest issue of JJMJS.

I have read Evans’ and van Putten’s article “I am the Messiah and I Can Revive the Dead” – A Critical Note on T.S. NS 164.26, a Fragment of the Toledot Yeshu, which is part of this JJMJS issue, with great enthusiasm.
Especially the English translation of this Cairo Genizah sheet (recto/verso) is a revelation. Below I only give the verses that relate to my theory of the war origins of Christianity. The complete translation can easily be found via the link in the OP (on page 117 and 119 of the article).

Prior to their translation the authors mention the following sigla:
[…] indicates damaged text
• (…) denotes an addition of the editor.

Then follows their recto (p. 117) and verso (p. 119) translation.

1. … […. This man]
2. is a soothsayer, and he destroys the people of [Jerusalem?]

7. And his signs are that “In his days he will liberate all of
8. Israel, and they will live secure from the enemies” (Jer. 23:6) …

3. [and there was] great [strife in Israel], and they started to [come together to him; and they joined] him. …

7. … . The queen sent horsemen after him. And so they found him in Galilee and he had already led
4. her people astray. …

10. … . The horsemen
11. stopped in order to capture him and take him to the
12. queen. The people of Galilee did not let them and they intended
13. to fight them.

Toledot Yeshu is a group of quite varied Jewish manuscripts, of which the texts that mention a certain queen Helen are a subgroup. Fragment T.S. NS 164.26 belongs to this subgroup, so the queen mentioned in verse 7 and 12 of the verso page is queen Helen. In her superb article Polymorphic Helena (1) Galit Hasan-Rokem shows that, in the absence of chronological markers in the text, characteristics of at least two historical queen Helens can be discerned in the texts: queen Helen of Adiabene (first half of the first century CE) and Helena Augusta, the mother of the Roman emperor Constantine (third/fourth century CE). Queen Helen of Adiabene fits best the chronology of the birth of Christianity, and members of the royal house of Adiabene took part in the rebellion against Rome, which could explain the warlike atmosphere of this fragment. However, as the Adiabene princes and their troops sided the Jewish rebels and as the horsemen in this fragment are clearly the enemies of Jesus and his Galilean following, I believe this fragment does not refer to queen Helen of Adiabene and to Adiabene involvement in the war. More probably the hostile horsemen refer to Roman cavalry, to which the Roman empress Helena Augusta can be linked. I consider Helena Augusta – although chronologically misplaced – as the representation of Rome in this fragment.
The protagonist of the fragment, who is not mentioned by name, of course is Jesus.

Toledot Yeshu is not a historical work, therefore its analysis does not yield strong evidence but is rather suggestive. These suggestions become stronger with the frequency of the connections, which are numerous in this fragment.

I start my discussion with the verso side, which yields the strongest clues.

• In verse 4 people come to Jesus while there is great strife in Israel. The gathering of a multitude of people is reminiscent of Mark 3:7-8: (7) Jesus withdrew with his disciples to the sea, and a great multitude from Galilee followed; also from Judea (8) and Jerusalem and Idumea and from beyond the Jordan and form about Tyre and Sidon a great multitude, hearing all that he did, came to him. The use of similar paired verbs in both fragments, ‘followed’ and ‘came (to him)’ in Mark, and ‘(started to) come together’ and ‘joined (him)’ points in the direction of dependence of T.S. NS 164.26 on Mark 3. The ‘great strife in Israel’ is not specified but the first that comes to mind is the great revolt of 66-70 CE. Other verses of this fragment support a war reading of the ‘great strife’ (see below).

• Verse 7 tells that ‘the queen sent horsemen after him’. These horsemen in the context of a great conflict suggest cavalry, Roman cavalry more specifically.

• Then follows ‘so they found him in Galilee’, which seems to signify that there was a confrontation between Jesus and Roman cavalry in Galilee. In The Jewish War book III:497 Josephus describes the attack of Roman cavalry on the Galilean city Tarichaeae that was defended by Jesus son of Saphat and his revolutionary army.

• ‘He had already led her people astray’ is rather obscure but also points in the direction of opposition between Jesus and queen Helen’s people, the Romans.

• In verses 10-12 ’the horsemen stopped in order to capture him and take him to the queen’, in other words the Roman cavalry tried to take Jesus prisoner and to bring him before the queen. There was no Roman queen or empress present in Galilee during the rebellion, but the future emperors Vespasian and Titus commanded the Roman army, so there is an ‘empress’/’future emperor’ link. The Romans did not succeed in taking Jesus prisoner, as the latter fled to Jerusalem, as Josephus describes in War III:498.

• Further on in verses 12 and 13 ‘the people of Galilee did not let them and they intended to fight them.’ The resistance of the Galileans seems to be the reason why the Romans were not able to capture Jesus.

• Verses 1 and 2 of the recto side mention that Jesus destroyed the people of Jerusalem. In the context of the great revolt this sentence may refer to the internal strife between different factions in Jerusalem in the years 68/69 CE, with Jesus as one of the leaders of the Zealot faction. This civil war had a lot of casualties.

• In verses 7 and 8 Jeremiah 23:6 is applied to Jesus: In his days he will liberate all of Israel, and they will live secure from the enemies. To liberate Israel from the Romans and to live secure from them was one of the main goals of the Great Revolt.
Luke 1:71 and 74 are likewise reminiscent of this Jeremiah verse.

Although Toledot Yeshu does not convey overt historical information, this tiny fragment out of the vast number of Cairo Genizah documents seems to be supportive of Jesus’ activity as rebellion leader during the war of the Jews against the Romans, and therefore of my theory.

(1) Galit Hasan-Rokem, Polymorphic Helena – Toledot Yeshu as a Palimpsest of Religious Narratives and Identities in Toledot Yeshu (“The Life Story of Jesus”) Revisited: A Princeton Conference. Peter Schäfer, Michael Meerson, and Yaacov Deutsch, editors. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011, pp. 247-82.

The practical modes of concealment are limited only by the imaginative capacity of subordinates.
James C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance p. 139

Post Reply