Why “Paulus”?

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 13853
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Why “Paulus”?

Post by Giuseppe »

Couchoud had proposed the idea that Paul means "the little one", to mean that he was small in stature.

But we know about Dyonisius exiguus = “Dionysus the Little one”. Hence Paulus doesn't mean the same thing of exiguus.

The Acts hypothesis about Paul as a stupid derivation from Shaul is too much stupid to be considered seriously, just as the hypothesis of a derivation from the presumed benefactor of Paul, Sergius Paulus. Anything coming from Acts is stupid.

The precise sense in Latin of Paulus is: a small amount, a bit.

The question arises by need: a smalle amount... ...of what?

Of the divine spark, naturally!
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
Charles Wilson
Posts: 2107
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:13 am

Re: Why “Paulus”?

Post by Charles Wilson »

Giuseppe wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 7:14 amCouchoud had proposed the idea that Paul means "the little one", to mean that he was small in stature...

The question arises by need: a small amount... ...of what?
Of the divine spark, naturally!
Ummm...No.

You can be "small" in stature and be very tall otherwise, depending on what "Small in stature" refers.

Suetonius, 12 Caesars, "Vespasian":

"Though Licinius Mucianus, a man of notorious unchastity, presumed upon his services to treat Vespasian with scant respect, he never had the heart to criticize him except privately and then only to the extent of adding to a complaint made to a common friend, the significant words: "I at least am a man. 30..."

Note #30: "Implying that Mucianus was effeminate and unchaste."

Believe me when I tell ya': This is Paul, right here.

CW
User avatar
Irish1975
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:01 am

Re: Why “Paulus”?

Post by Irish1975 »

"Paulus, -a, -um" is indeed a Latin adjective. But it is also listed in Wikipedia as a less common Roman praenomen, sometimes spelled Paullus; and also as a known Roman cognomen. He could have acquired it as a nickname because of an individual attribute, or it might have just been his given proper name.

Paul only ever uses that one name for himself. It is striking that he, supposedly a Jew, does not name his father in Philippians 3:5.
User avatar
Jax
Posts: 1443
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 6:10 am

Re: Why “Paulus”?

Post by Jax »

His nickname perhaps? "Shorty"?
Post Reply