Still very confusing about that Davidic thing. And more speculations.the presence of a evident LIE (being davidic) in that list of earthly OT traditional features of the Jewish Christ raises the doubt about the real function of that list. Was mere embrional pre-Gospel midrash from the scriptures? Or was a false Paul judaizing the genuine pauline Jesus?
Oh. Just like those born of a woman, descendant of Abraham, Jesse, David & Israelites. And servants of the Jews, in poverty. Those have a very short life, isn't?because we know that Paul lived more years. Jesus lived only the time necessary for the crucifixion. In the Ascension of Isaiah (without interpolations) he is not born on this earth.
Again the AoI, the reference gospel of the mythicist!
Questioners? None are questioning Jesus in these two verses. Anyway, Jesus does not say he does not have a human family. Certainly, the author missed his chance to have Jesus saying he has no human parents! Something that Marcionite reader of the gospel would have been instructed already.the info about the presence of the his mother and brothers was a lie meant to make Jesus reveal the his true origin in the eyes of the his questioners. That was the marcionite interpretation of the episode. It takes the form of a typical temptation. So the family of Jesus was a real mirage in Mcn.
And from where did you get that marcionite interpretation?
Argument from silence again. Anyone born of a woman and attributed ancestors such as Abraham, Jesse, David & Israelites starts their life as a baby. So are servant of the Jews.why didn't Paul say that Jesus became a mere child, as a lot of talmudists said about the future Messiah (that he would have appeared as a child before)? The interpolator of the Ascension of Isaiah introduced the birth as a child, not the real author.
You are introducing that starting as a baby in the case of Jesus. If Jesus became a servant then he became an adult. Why have you to introduce again and again things that are not in the text?
Cordially, Bernard