Sorry about that. It was a typo.MrMacSon wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 4:57 amI presume you mean "..the passage of or by Dio Cassius .."Joseph D. L. wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 12:35 am Stuart Waugh is of the opinion that applying Mark 13 is anachronistic, since, he argues, Hadrian never had an alter to Jupiter dedicated in the Temple, and in fact did not even include the Temple mount in Aelia Capitolina. He also argues that the passage to Dio Cassius which says he did is a later interpolation ..
did what?
- Hadrian had an alter to Jupiter dedicated in the Temple?, or
- Hadrian included the Temple mount in Aelia Capitolina??
It was supposed to be "in" Dio Cassius, but what can you do?
And I know Stuart maintains that passage as interpolated, but I think it was just an altar as opposed to a full blown temple.