Re: Luke's date for the crucifixion
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:31 pm
They generally presume late dating and do not relate to the analysis of those gentlemen. So they are not particularly relevant..Secret Alias wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 3:18 pmBut do you have any examples of individuals from what we might call the post-Christian era - the era we now live - who have the same trust and respect for Luke as a historian?
Yet these gentlemen show that again and again Luke had an accurate knowledge from the early 1st century.Secret Alias wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 3:18 pmAs a result we certainly can't know whether or not the details in question are accurately reported on or not.
Too vague without specific references.Secret Alias wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 3:18 pmThe fact that some Christians thought Acts was a fiction and more over didn't accept Luke as a witness for anything makes any reasonable person question Luke's legitimacy.