Page 1 of 2
Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 11:45 am
by Secret Alias
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 1:46 pm
by Jax
Very interesting videos by Alan Garrow. I am very interested in seeing where this leads.
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:58 am
by Jax
Arrrrgggggg......
I'm not a member of Bart's blog so I can't access the response of Mark Goodacre to Alan Garrow’s argument on Matthew using Luke and the Didache.
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:23 am
by Secret Alias
I am friends with Goodacre on Facebook. He's going to post it on his blog shortly.
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:02 am
by g_n_o_s_i_s
Isn't this almost exactly what Klinghardt argues except he uses the Gospel of the Lord as the source for Matthew instead of Luke?
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:36 am
by Jax
Secret Alias wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:23 am
I am friends with Goodacre on Facebook. He's going to post it on his blog shortly.
Cool.
If you would, could you post a link to it when it is available? Also do you know if there is a written version of Alan Garrow’s argument that we can access?
Thanks
Jax
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:13 pm
by Secret Alias
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:52 pm
by MrMacSon
Richard Bauckham
12/9/2017 03:31:50 pm
I was convinced by your argument (except for your retention of a rump of the Q hypothesis) some time ago. Why don't I get $1000?
Alan Garrow
12/10/2017 04:52:29 am
Because your endorsement is priceless (and I'm not setting the rules!)
https://www.alangarrow.com/blog/barts-1000-gamble
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:14 pm
by neilgodfrey
Jax wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:58 am
Arrrrgggggg......
I'm not a member of Bart's blog so I can't access the response of Mark Goodacre to Alan Garrow’s argument on Matthew using Luke and the Didache.
There's something "off" about being given a $1000 to post something yet still keeping what you post behind a paywall. Ehrman is so not into open or public access of information. Something .... what's the word, .... some might say "American"(?) about it?
(Yes, I know, the $ goes to a charity of his choice, as if no-one else would think of giving to a charity if it weren't for their desire to know what he thinks. Something very "off" about his MO.)
Re: Garrow's $1000 Challenge
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:29 pm
by Jax
neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:14 pm
Jax wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:58 am
Arrrrgggggg......
I'm not a member of Bart's blog so I can't access the response of Mark Goodacre to Alan Garrow’s argument on Matthew using Luke and the Didache.
There's something "off" about being given a $1000 to post something yet still keeping what you post behind a paywall. Ehrman is so not into open or public access of information. Something .... what's the word, .... some might say "American"(?) about it?
(Yes, I know, the $ goes to a charity of his choice, as if no-one else would think of giving to a charity if it weren't for their desire to know what he thinks. Something very "off" about his MO.)
I agree completely.