Burial of Jesus
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2017 6:09 am
Bart October 23, 2017
Do you think Pilate made an exception for the other two crucified with Jesus? And for the the people crucified the next day? And the day after that? And that in fact Jews around jerusalem were always buried, and that *this* was Roman policy? Seems highly implausible to me.
Bart October 27, 2017
He didn’t back down because he appreciated Jewish piety but because he realized there was a revolution brewing and he didn’t want to be responsible for it. THat’s the point of Josephus’s story. If people would riot over Jesus, why wouldn’t they riot over anyone else crucified at the time? We tend to make Jesus a special case because he became so massively important after these events.
October 27, 2017
Yes, I think so. Pilate had no reason to expect a mass riot for Jesus’ death than for the death of any of the other insurrectionists he was crucifying at the time.
This would be a good time for us to bring this particular discussion to an end.
according to ehrman, jesus was an unknown
pilate wouldn't worry about mass riot
pilate would not grant special request to take down the body.
carrier on the other hand says that pilate would allow jews to bury their convicts
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/12786
Judea at that time was still under treaty with Rome, for helping Augustus win the Civil War against Mark Antony. That treaty explicitly said the Roman government would respect the Jewish laws. The Jewish laws mandated proper burial before sundown of any who died—including, and indeed explicitly, executed criminals.