Page 7 of 8

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:16 pm
by Secret Alias
Like the original idiotic point is more interesting or worth investigating that a pattern of retarded beliefs bouncing around in your head.

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:33 pm
by Jax
Secret Alias wrote: Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:16 pm Like the original idiotic point is more interesting or worth investigating that a pattern of retarded beliefs bouncing around in your head.
Ese! Chill!

This stuff is gold. :D

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:37 pm
by Jax
^ how about some tunes BTW?

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:16 am
by Maestroh
Steven Avery wrote: Mon Apr 23, 2018 2:56 am Bill Brown started a thread here:

Nutbag Conspiracy Theorist Is Posting Here
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=4106&sid=ad517a47a3 ... d94a959c64

Where, despite the charged thread title, the topic is open. I put in a post last night.

That should prevent the diversion of threads.

Steven

The title is 100% accurate.

The fact the title bothers you more than the behavior that inspired it is proof (if any were needed) of total depravity.

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 7:13 am
by Steven Avery
Answered in the lounge.

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:16 am
by Secret Alias
So Steven. You seem to have attached yourself to two theories - that the discovery of Sinaiticus centuries ago was a fraud and that the slaughter of 20 kids and 6 adults at Sandy Hook in recent memory was a fraud. Which theory do you think has more going for it? Do you see any commonality in your approach to 'debunking' established historical fact in each case? Which insane theory do you think makes you look more contemptible? I think there is a commonality. I don't think you arrived at either opinion from the actual evidence. You wanted to believe that Sinaiticus and Sandy Hook were fakes for selfish reasons. It's utterly demented but you simply wish away reality because it allows for your presuppositions to stay intact.

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:16 pm
by Maestroh
Secret Alias wrote: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:16 am So Steven. You seem to have attached yourself to two theories - that the discovery of Sinaiticus centuries ago was a fraud and that the slaughter of 20 kids and 6 adults at Sandy Hook in recent memory was a fraud. Which theory do you think has more going for it? Do you see any commonality in your approach to 'debunking' established historical fact in each case? Which insane theory do you think makes you look more contemptible? I think there is a commonality. I don't think you arrived at either opinion from the actual evidence. You wanted to believe that Sinaiticus and Sandy Hook were fakes for selfish reasons. It's utterly demented but you simply wish away reality because it allows for your presuppositions to stay intact.
This is one of his many devious tricks - claim he's answered something elsewhere.


The first straight answer you receive from this guy will be from someone who hacked his account.

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 3:32 pm
by Secret Alias
I don't get how it should be surprising to him that we should link his theory that Sandy Hook 'is fake news' with his belief in his Sinaiticus forgery theory. Surely he sees that people are mourning over the loss of loved ones at Sandy Hook. It's not like there isn't evidence of a mass killing. He simply chooses not to see it or not to believe in it. How shouldn't we see the same thing at work in his brain - the way he process information and decides on how to weigh evidence. No one talks about Sinaiticus in the real world. But Sandy Hook is understandably a very big deal. It is the unthinkable for a parent and for a child. Why wouldn't you go with the obvious here? There is suffering. There are gravestones. There is eyewitness reporting. Sinaiticus might simply be a crazy obsession of a fatigued mind. Like the guy who keeps eating hot dogs to the point he becomes a hot dog eating champion. But Sandy Hook tells you that we are dealing with a serious monster.

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:23 pm
by Maestroh
Secret Alias wrote: Tue Apr 24, 2018 3:32 pm I don't get how it should be surprising to him that we should link his theory that Sandy Hook 'is fake news' with his belief in his Sinaiticus forgery theory. Surely he sees that people are mourning over the loss of loved ones at Sandy Hook. It's not like there isn't evidence of a mass killing. He simply chooses not to see it or not to believe in it. How shouldn't we see the same thing at work in his brain - the way he process information and decides on how to weigh evidence. No one talks about Sinaiticus in the real world. But Sandy Hook is understandably a very big deal. It is the unthinkable for a parent and for a child. Why wouldn't you go with the obvious here? There is suffering. There are gravestones. There is eyewitness reporting. Sinaiticus might simply be a crazy obsession of a fatigued mind. Like the guy who keeps eating hot dogs to the point he becomes a hot dog eating champion. But Sandy Hook tells you that we are dealing with a serious monster.

Better yet my own brother was a news producer on the case (he lives in Connecticut). But yeah, we have some quacks. He also covered the Patriots Day bombing, yet another event dismissed as a conspiracy theory.

Re: Sinaiticus homoeoteleuton from source ms Claromontanus (D06)

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:26 pm
by Steven Avery
Again, all responded to in the Lounge.