A simple question about Bible manuscript variants

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
andrewcriddle
Posts: 2852
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:36 am

Re: A simple question about Bible manuscript variants

Post by andrewcriddle »

For the periscope de adultera in the later Syriac see remnants

Andrew Criddle
User avatar
Battar Kurdi
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:39 am

Re: A simple question about Bible manuscript variants

Post by Battar Kurdi »

very very thanks friends :thumbup:
But the image above looks like it may be from the Khaboris Codex; this is based on a Google Image search, not on my (limited) personal knowledge of the Syriac manuscript tradition.
i hear some one claim that this ms is form 165 A.D !! and it contain john 8.1-11 !! :banghead:
i am quite sure he is wrong ... but first i must know what is this ms !
.. i well try to find it here: :goodmorning:
http://dukhrana.com/khabouris/
User avatar
Battar Kurdi
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:39 am

Re: A simple question about Bible manuscript variants

Post by Battar Kurdi »

and maybe this guy claim that is form 165 A.D because of this :
Age: The AENT website says "The Khabouris Manuscript is a copy of a Second Century New Testament, which was written in approximately 165 AD (internally documented as 100 years after the great persecution of the Christians by Nero, in 65 AD). Carbon dating has found this
http://therefinersfire.org/khabouris_codex.htm
Post Reply