For the periscope de adultera in the later Syriac see remnants
Andrew Criddle
A simple question about Bible manuscript variants
-
- Posts: 2852
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:36 am
- Battar Kurdi
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:39 am
Re: A simple question about Bible manuscript variants
very very thanks friends
i am quite sure he is wrong ... but first i must know what is this ms !
.. i well try to find it here:
http://dukhrana.com/khabouris/
i hear some one claim that this ms is form 165 A.D !! and it contain john 8.1-11 !!But the image above looks like it may be from the Khaboris Codex; this is based on a Google Image search, not on my (limited) personal knowledge of the Syriac manuscript tradition.
i am quite sure he is wrong ... but first i must know what is this ms !
.. i well try to find it here:
http://dukhrana.com/khabouris/
- Battar Kurdi
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:39 am
- Battar Kurdi
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:39 am
Re: A simple question about Bible manuscript variants
and maybe this guy claim that is form 165 A.D because of this :
http://therefinersfire.org/khabouris_codex.htmAge: The AENT website says "The Khabouris Manuscript is a copy of a Second Century New Testament, which was written in approximately 165 AD (internally documented as 100 years after the great persecution of the Christians by Nero, in 65 AD). Carbon dating has found this