Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
The Bartimeus's episode confirms your point very well: the blind people see Jesus the Nazarene, the mortal man, and they will continue to see the mortal man even when he will be risen!, while only the people who see really, only them (Bartimeus in primis after the healing), will understand that the true hero of the holy fable is the alien possessor (= separationism), not the mere recipient, Jesus Nazarene.
This reading confutes definitely spin's attempt that Nazareth is interpolated in 1:6.
This reading confutes definitely spin's attempt that Nazareth is interpolated in 1:6.
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
The subtle point conveyed by the original separationist author ('Mark') is that the pious women were looking for Jesus "the Nazarene", that is, the mortal Jesus, the same Jesus who perished on the cross after being abandoned by the alien Spirit who possessed him throughout his brief ministry, only, in spite of the fact that this Jesus is indeed resurrected, he continues to have the sole 'sin' of being only Jesus "the Nazarene," that is, the man without the spirit, as only a Nazarene Jesus could be before being possessed by the spiritual 'Christ' in the Jordan.
Hence, 'Nazaret' is original in 1:6, pace spin.
Now I should search for that scholar who had proposed this same doctrine for Cerinthus (that the human recipient died and was risen, without being really the true hero of the story). I don't remember the name...
ADDENDA: the prof is Charles E. Hill. Read from here on.
Hence, 'Nazaret' is original in 1:6, pace spin.
Now I should search for that scholar who had proposed this same doctrine for Cerinthus (that the human recipient died and was risen, without being really the true hero of the story). I don't remember the name...
ADDENDA: the prof is Charles E. Hill. Read from here on.
- JoeWallack
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
Simon he surnamed Peter;
and Simon the Cananaean,
and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him.
- and James the [son] of Zebedee, and John the brother of James; and them he surnamed Boanerges, which is, Sons of thunder:
- and Andrew, and Philip
- and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas
- and James the [son] of Alphaeus, and Levi,
and Simon the Cananaean,
and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him.
- JoeWallack
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last first.
Simon he surnamed Peter; | Denied |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
and Simon the Cananaean, | - |
and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. | Betrayed |
- JoeWallack
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56hqrlQxMMI
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last first.
Simon he surnamed Peter; | Denied |
|
|
| - |
| - |
| - |
| Alpha |
and Simon the Cananaean, | - |
and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. | Betrayed |
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
Where is the evidence of fiction?JoeWallack wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 4:58 pm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56hqrlQxMMI
But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last first.
Simon he surnamed Peter; Denied
- and James the [son] of Zebedee, and John the brother of James; and them he surnamed Boanerges, which is, Sons of thunder:
10:41 And when the ten heard it, they began to be moved with indignation concerning James and John.
42 And Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them, Ye know that they who are accounted to rule over the Gentiles lord it over them; and their great ones exercise authority over them.
43 But it is not so among you: but whosoever would become great [μέγας] among you, shall be your minister;
44 and whosoever would be first among you, shall be servant of all.
- and Andrew, and Philip
-
- and Bartholomew,
-
- and Matthew, and Thomas
-
- and James the [son] of Alphaeus, and Levi,
Alpha and Simon the Cananaean, - and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. Betrayed
Alphaeus... ἄλφα
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E1%BC%8 ... F%86%CE%B1
Still perplexed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56hqrlQxMMI
- JoeWallack
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56hqrlQxMMI
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
and last of all, as to the [child] untimely born, he appeared to me also.
But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last first.
Simon he surnamed Peter; | Denied |
|
|
| - |
| - |
| - |
| Alpha |
and Simon the Cananaean, | - |
and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. | Betrayed |
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
- JoeWallack
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56hqrlQxMMI
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
and last of all, as to the [child] untimely born, he appeared to me also.
But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last first.
Simon he surnamed Peter; | 1. Denied 2. "Simon is the first Disciple". |
|
|
| - |
| - |
| - |
| Alpha |
and Simon the Cananaean, | "Simon" is the last Disciple. (Since Judas betrayed Jesus he would not have been the last Disciple. Is this contrivance the reason for "Mark" to spoil the surprise?) |
and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. | Betrayed |
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
- JoeWallack
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mark's DiualCritical Marks. Names Use As Evidence of Fiction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56hqrlQxMMI
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
and last of all, as to the [child] untimely born, he appeared to me also.
But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last first.
Simon he surnamed Peter; | 1. Denied 2. "Simon is the first Disciple". |
| 2. James and John = brothers. |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 1. Alpha 2. James and Levi = brothers (both sons of Alphaeus). KK has also pointed out the special chiasm here. "James" gets the special brotherly treatment here. An echo of "brother of the Lord"? I think so. 3. Do I really need KK to point out the connection between the saying regarding Disciples "First last and last first" and the listing of Disciples with "Mega" (great) first and Alpha last for an author who used the Greek Alphabet? |
and Simon the Cananaean, | "Simon" is the last Disciple. (Since Judas betrayed Jesus he would not have been the last Disciple. Is this contrivance the reason for "Mark" to spoil the surprise?) |
and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. | Betrayed |
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
- JoeWallack
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:22 pm
- Contact:
Brother Can You Spare A Denari?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56hqrlQxMMI
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry
and last of all, as to the [child] untimely born, he appeared to me also.
But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last first.
Simon he surnamed Peter; | 1. Denied 2. "Simon is the first Disciple". |
| 2. James and John = brothers. |
| Only one of the two (names) is identified as a brother, Andrew is the brother of Simon. |
| - |
| Wait, no brother here? Wrong! "Thomas" means "twin" and if he was a twin he was a brother. So one (name) is identified as a brother. |
| 1. Alpha 2. James and Levi = brothers (both sons of Alphaeus). KK has also pointed out the special chiasm here. "James" gets the special brotherly treatment here. An echo of "brother of the Lord"? I think so. 3. Do I really need KK to point out the connection between the saying regarding Disciples "First last and last first" and the listing of Disciples with "Mega" (great) first and Alpha last for an author who used the Greek Alphabet? |
and Simon the Cananaean, | "Simon" is the last Disciple. (Since Judas betrayed Jesus he would not have been the last Disciple. Is this contrivance the reason for "Mark" to spoil the surprise?) |
and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. | Betrayed |
Joseph
https://vridar.org/responding-to-adl-propaganda/
The New Porphyry