Is *Ev more paulinist than Mark?

[Giuseppe]

Therefore, the Gospel of Mark should be read independently of Paul so that its unique features might be first understood within its own narrative world, rather than interpreted through a Pauline lens.

https://scholarlypublishingcollective.o ... m=fulltext

[MrMacSon]

You question, "Is *Ev more Paulinist than Mark?," bears no relationship to the title of the article, viz., "Is the Gospel of Mark Distinctly Pauline?", or to the abstract there. Why on earth ...????

[Giuseppe]

Evidently the implication escapes your attention. If Mark is not Paulinist, then the next question is: who is more Paulinist among the other gospels?

[MrMacSon]

Acts of the Apostles

[MrMacSon]

If Mark is not Paulinist, then the next question is:

• What dumb jerk thinks Mark is not 'Paulinist'?
  • see viewtopic.php?p=159661#p159661

• The most pertinent question might be: what text, besides Acts of the Apostles, might be as Paulinist as Mark?

[Peter Kirby]

Acts of Paul?

Although I feel like the meme: I'm not sure what makes a Paulinist, and at this point I'm afraid to ask.

[Giuseppe]

A Paulinist is an evangelist who bases a lot of midrash on Paul.

In addition to share with Paul the same form in U of the Christ's voyage: descent, death, ascent.

[Sinouhe]

If Mark is not Paulinist, then the next question is:

• What dumb jerk thinks Mark is not 'Paulinist'?
  • see viewtopic.php?p=159661#p159661

• The most pertinent question might be: what text, besides Acts of the Apostles, might be as Paulinist as Mark?

Exact.

[Giuseppe]

I assume that John Van Maaren has read these books before that he has published this article.