My assumption are as follows:THE GREEK ORTHODOX PATRIARCHATE OF JERUSALEM
CENTRAL LIBRARY
GREEK ORTHODOX PATRIARCHATE
P. O. BOX 19632/633
JERUSALEM – ISRAEL
The undersigned archimandrite Kallistos, librarian of the Central Library of I.K.[unknown initials] received from the Monastery of the holy father Savvas the holy the book named “Saint Ignatios letter” (1 page ?) published at the University of Amsterdam – 1646, bearing at its end a handwritten letter referring to the name “Clementios Stromateos” and addressed to someone named Theodoros, unpublished and disputed as far as concerning its authenticity. The book was transferred from the above-mentioned monastery to be added to the collection of Saint Savvas manuscripts.
Jerusalem June 18th [Iulian]/5 [Gregorian] 1976
Reception witness
(-) Illegible
Archimandrite Meliton The receiver
(-) Illegible
Archimandrite Kallistos – Librarian
Illegible round stamp
1. Since Kallistos wrote the letter he means "disputed as far as concerning its authenticity" to mean it is, as his stated position in 1983, a pseudepigraphon transcribed in the 18th century, and not with respect to whether or not it was forged by Morton Smith.
2. Kallistos read something about the letter and the presence of heretics in the monastery in a publication, likely Nea Sion, which was the basis for this assumption, as again stated to Quesnell in 1983.
3. Seraphim viewed the document as part of the libary and so Flusser, again from Quesnell's reporting in 1983, was demanding the manuscript stay at Mar Saba.
4. The manuscript was placed on the shelves of manuscripts at Mar Saba by the same letter we are discussing so even Kallistos viewed the letter as an "authentic" i.e. pre-Morton Smith manuscript which belonged with the other manuscripts of Mar Saba.