Re: History trumps Theology
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:13 pm
Why do you even bother to post if you cannot hope to convince anyone because you have no kind of basis for the theory whatsoever?
Investigating the roots of western civilization (ye olde BC&H forum of IIDB lives on...)
https://earlywritings.com/forum/
Picked up arguments parasitically from skeptics?Peter Kirby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:08 pmAt this point, you would logically just become skeptical of the historicity of Jesus.maryhelena wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:42 pm There is no evidence for any gospel Jesus theory or interpretation. No evidence... Zero.
Instead, you have picked up the arguments of these skeptics parasitically to suggest that a completely unevidenced theory can be introduced into the vacuum of the supposed lack of any evidence for historicity being argued for by them.
Peter Kirby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:13 pm Why do you even bother to post if you cannot hope to convince anyone because you have no kind of basis for the theory whatsoever?
Wish I could but I can't hold a tune..while an Irish rebel song might do justice to the Hasmonean rebels....perhaps it would not be welcome....Charles Wilson wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:52 amSo I invite maryhelena to sing a Duet with me entitled, "Who were the Hasmoneans?"Peter Kirby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:18 am If there's an intellectual graveyard, then there is also a history of it, and all theology is also part of history.
CW
There are ideas I don't buy. We all judge ideas as best we can. Indeed, a very sad day were we to judge all ideas to be of equal merit.Peter Kirby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:37 pm If we found that every single idea whatsoever was of equal merit, that would be a very sad day indeed.
But, no, I don't buy it.
And if I did, I wouldn't see much point in pure speculation either.
maryhelena wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:12 pm Nobody on this forum has evidence for a historical gospel Jesus. People offer theories, interpretations, opinions.
[T]he Christ is understood [as] the Jesus of the New Testament. . . . He is the Christ myth.
--Remsburg, John Eleazer (1909). The Christ: A Critical Review and Analysis of the Evidences of His Existence. p. 9.
The real question of the historicity of Jesus is not merely whether there ever was a Jesus among the numerous claimants of a Messiahship in Judea, but whether we are to recognise the historical character of this Jesus in the Gospels, and whether he is to be regarded as the founder of Christianity.
--Kalthoff, Albert (1907). "Was There An Historical Jesus?". The Rise of Christianity. Translated by Joseph McCabe. London: Watts. p. 28.
[E]vidence has to make [the] alternative hypotheses less likely, that the only way to do this is to collect evidence that’s unlikely to be observed on alternative hypotheses, and that reliable procedures are by definition those capable of doing that.
--Carrier (6 March 2019). "Hypothesis: Only Those Who Don't Really Understand Bayesianism Are Against It". Richard Carrier Blogs.
What does the slogan mean?maryhelena wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:14 pm That history trumps theology is surely a fundamental approach to intellectual deliberations.
It means what it says. History and theology are not equal methods for the task of understanding the past.Peter Kirby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:15 pmWhat does the slogan mean?maryhelena wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:14 pm That history trumps theology is surely a fundamental approach to intellectual deliberations.