Search found 665 matches
- Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:32 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
to Michael BG, I went to your web page. I think there is an error there. You talk of Luke 2:1 I think you mean 3:1. “2:1-2 reads: [1] In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be enrolled. [2] This was the first enrollment, when Quirin'i-us was governor of Syria...
- Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:02 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
to Michael BG, Do you think that Jesus was born in 6 CE and Luke 2:1-2 is historical? If so why? The answer, NO for 6 CE, & YES for Lk 2:2. For LK 2:1, very likely NO (but I don't use that). Everything is explained here: http://historical-jesus.info/appa.html I went to your web page. I think th...
- Wed Mar 20, 2019 3:41 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
to Michael BG, To state that Luke might not have created Paul being in Corinth at the time of Gallio is a long way from stating that it is a certainty on which your whole time-frame for Paul should be based. We know Luke likes to create false history so the likelihood is that this is false too. Why...
- Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:32 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
to Michael BG, About Theudas and Judas: no context, "Luke" was wrong. I deducted from that ( http://historical-jesus.info/59.html ), and other multiple things ( http://historical-jesus.info/appb.html ), that "Luke" did not have Josephus' Antiquities. However that does not mean t...
- Tue Mar 19, 2019 6:16 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
Paul never called any member of the church of Jerusalem to be "brothers" or "in Christ". And that's only one argument among many against those being Christians. I found 35 for Paul's conversion, 52 for the council of Jerusalem, and Paul's dispute with Peter in Antioch, and the s...
- Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:06 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
Michael BG wrote: However in this thread I am not interested in wheres and the only whens I am interested in are Q and Paul’s letters. (We should try to date Paul’s letter without using Acts. I took a lot of trouble to do a lot of investigation about dating Paul's letters, taking out the interpolat...
- Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:04 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
As a possible parallel, assuming the same author of Luke and Acts, there is more explicit Christology in Acts and in the first 2 chapters of Luke than in the main section of Luke. Early Christian writers IMO could distinguish between their Christology and their account of the earthly ministry of Je...
- Mon Mar 18, 2019 7:36 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
Bernard, I thought you would disagree with me regarding Lk 12:8-9. I see at least two issues with what you wrote, but I am not going to discuss them in this thread (I think one of them we have discussed in another thread). This thread is about the lack of the title Christ in Q and what reasons there...
- Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:55 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
Bernard, years ago you had a different website with more colourful background pages. I think I read everything you had up at that time, including your discussion of Q using Mark. You are always so positive with your conclusions! For me each ‘conclusion’ is not definite but what I think is most likel...
- Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:59 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: No Christology in the Q community
- Replies: 101
- Views: 99565
Re: No Christology in the Q community
DCHindley, I am very surprised about how much you put into Q2 for Kloppenborg. I will look again at my copy of Excavating Q: The History and Setting of the Sayings Gospel and the notes I have made and come back with a fuller response tomorrow. Well, I'm sure I pieced it together from sources, … For...