Search found 762 matches
- Thu Mar 16, 2023 9:49 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Biblical academic: it's just a religion really
- Replies: 16
- Views: 1189
Re: Biblical academic: it's just a religion really
The Septuagint Torah with but a couple to a scant few passages translated in a Christian leaning way is a Christian work that might have been retroactively forced upon Jews. The original circa 273 BC Septuagint Torah is lost to history. All extant Torah's claiming to be the Septuagint are thereby fo...
- Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:45 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 589
Re: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
Thank you Stuart!
- Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:37 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 589
Re: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
Stuart,
Is it possible that an ur-Mark (or proto-Mark) ended at 15:37?
Is it possible that an ur-Mark (or proto-Mark) ended at 15:37?
- Sat Mar 11, 2023 1:59 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 589
Re: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
I'm of the opinion that whenever Peter (who may be a completely different character from Cephas) appears within a NT text (as Peter) one should at least pause a moment to reflect upon the potential of flashing backward in time whereby to witness the hand of a proto-orthodox scribe grinning ear to ea...
- Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:39 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 589
Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
If I'm reading him correctly, Martijn Linssen likely sees Mark 15:37 as the original ending, whereby with this I concur. But then along came the interpolation that spans from 15:38 through 16:8. And later still came the addition of 16:9-20. But I see verse 16:7 as a necessary redactional stitch adde...
- Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:02 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts
- Replies: 233
- Views: 14546
Re: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts
Is it Philo (and/or some Gnostic sects) who seemed to infer that before they sinned Adam and Eve were in a garden that existed within the heavenly realm? And that after they sinned (and after being covered in a skin worthy of covering their sin) they were found to be on earth? Would this (again via ...
- Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:44 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts
- Replies: 233
- Views: 14546
Re: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts
If one reads enough into Genesis 3:21 (that of course isn't found within the text at all), then one might infer that it was God who slew "the Lamb". And Isaiah 61:10 states that: "I will rejoice greatly in the Lord, My soul will exult in my God; For He has clothed me with garments of ...
- Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:14 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: A Simple Experiment With Paul
- Replies: 42
- Views: 3413
Re: A Simple Experiment With Paul
Nice! I wish this forum would institute "likes".
- Mon Mar 06, 2023 2:19 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: John's Baptism of Jesus
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1111
Re: John's Baptism of Jesus
Eph 4:5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism;
This has a highly catholocizing (lower case 'c') ring to it. Interpolation?
This has a highly catholocizing (lower case 'c') ring to it. Interpolation?
- Mon Mar 06, 2023 9:19 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts
- Replies: 233
- Views: 14546
Re: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts
I have no means whereby to found a guess. But the Jewish remnant could not have been all that large of a population. The Ebionites, if such factually existed, would seem to fit within my framework.