Search found 765 matches

by lsayre
Thu Mar 23, 2023 6:21 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: The Sarah-vs-Hagar allegory in Galatians 4:21–31
Replies: 28
Views: 1840

Re: The Sarah-vs-Hagar allegory in Galatians 4:21–31

Chrestians were not Judaics, perhaps some converts among them, and some of them surely had a Hebrew background, just like I have a Christian background that died decades ago. But I don't see why "Gentiles" would not be allowed to join, nor would something like that facilitate their explos...
by lsayre
Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:57 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: The Sarah-vs-Hagar allegory in Galatians 4:21–31
Replies: 28
Views: 1840

Re: The Sarah-vs-Hagar allegory in Galatians 4:21–31

One might presume that if a real Paul ever spoke before a real audience of Jews (or even gentiles for that matter) one of them at some juncture might have asked him to kindly explain some facts about Jesus origins and life and how he came to be a god, the details of his ministry, his death, and his ...
by lsayre
Tue Mar 21, 2023 4:25 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: The Sarah-vs-Hagar allegory in Galatians 4:21–31
Replies: 28
Views: 1840

Re: The Sarah-vs-Hagar allegory in Galatians 4:21–31

Jerk out the foundational cornerstone of the gentiles being of Sarah and the Jews being of Hagar and you have collapsed Paul's entire intellectual ground breaking structural framework, leaving him with nothing to stand upon. Paul's unique revelation that he contends came from God and not from man, p...
by lsayre
Thu Mar 16, 2023 9:49 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Biblical academic: it's just a religion really
Replies: 16
Views: 1195

Re: Biblical academic: it's just a religion really

The Septuagint Torah with but a couple to a scant few passages translated in a Christian leaning way is a Christian work that might have been retroactively forced upon Jews. The original circa 273 BC Septuagint Torah is lost to history. All extant Torah's claiming to be the Septuagint are thereby fo...
by lsayre
Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:37 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
Replies: 7
Views: 604

Re: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?

Stuart,

Is it possible that an ur-Mark (or proto-Mark) ended at 15:37?
by lsayre
Sat Mar 11, 2023 1:59 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
Replies: 7
Views: 604

Re: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?

I'm of the opinion that whenever Peter (who may be a completely different character from Cephas) appears within a NT text (as Peter) one should at least pause a moment to reflect upon the potential of flashing backward in time whereby to witness the hand of a proto-orthodox scribe grinning ear to ea...
by lsayre
Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:39 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?
Replies: 7
Views: 604

Is Mark 16:7 an interpolation within an interpolation?

If I'm reading him correctly, Martijn Linssen likely sees Mark 15:37 as the original ending, whereby with this I concur. But then along came the interpolation that spans from 15:38 through 16:8. And later still came the addition of 16:9-20. But I see verse 16:7 as a necessary redactional stitch adde...
by lsayre
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:02 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts
Replies: 233
Views: 14646

Re: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts

Is it Philo (and/or some Gnostic sects) who seemed to infer that before they sinned Adam and Eve were in a garden that existed within the heavenly realm? And that after they sinned (and after being covered in a skin worthy of covering their sin) they were found to be on earth? Would this (again via ...
by lsayre
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:44 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts
Replies: 233
Views: 14646

Re: Why I think a historical Jesus is best explanation for earliest texts

If one reads enough into Genesis 3:21 (that of course isn't found within the text at all), then one might infer that it was God who slew "the Lamb". And Isaiah 61:10 states that: "I will rejoice greatly in the Lord, My soul will exult in my God; For He has clothed me with garments of ...