Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

'vast'

Can anyone explain the reasoning that if nobody mentioned that Jesus was made up (and let's assume nothing like that was ever written, not just lost to history), therefore he must not be made up? Especially when all these writings arguing for him not being made up or him not being made up but being ...

you should do an intense youtube research program on Price, not read any of his books, and share your conclusions here where we can draw on your vast insights

well, it is usually called shipping AND handling

You can also get his commentary Letter to the Romans on amazon for $0.01 plus $4 shipping.

By all means guys, keep watching the youtubes and forego reading any actual papers.

outhouse wrote:
This does not give Parvus statement credibility one way or the other.

I find it just as credible as any commentary that assumes any given epistle is pretty much as Paul wrote sans a few obvious text critic variants/omissions.

For a corpus of writings that were charged with additions and subtractions from the moment they entered literary history, I'm continually amazed by people who refuse to accept the idea that we may very well be looking at highly edited works which do not resemble the original compositions.

Does Parvus have an account here or is this solely for our edification?

The fact that you would go to the length of writing an entire post about her in response to me only adds to my negative impression of your reading comprehension and motives. If it's all the same to you, I'm going to ignore you until you show signs of being a serious individual. Peace be with you. D...