Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

However, afaik, Joshua will have nothing to do with vulgarity. And I think Joshua would in fact like to arrange a discussion where James Snapp was the one taking the contra-authenticity position. You're such a whiny little baby. Run all over the Net trashing people and then get kicked back hard and...

Hi Joe, One point at a time. :) JW : All professional Paleographers that have studied it have concluded that Sinaiticus is early. First, can you name the professional palaeographers that have studied Sinaiticus, and were actually handling the manuscript, especially those who were looking at both se...

You want a whole essay simply because you are ignorant on the topic and make bogus claims? YOU are the one who made the claim about so many people. Now that you're caught between a rock and your big mouth, you want to point fingers. Why not just give us a list of, say, FIFTY scholars who say the en...

There is a long list of New Testament scholars, many traditionalists, some not, who place the Gospels in the 40-60AD range. Perhaps you could list them and their reasons for doing so. Yet even today, many hold to early NT dating. And have the Gospels ahead of Acts and the Epistles and Revelation. P...

Incidentally, I think "lost ending" is the most probable explanation.

JW : This Forum is based on Science and Logic so Steven has no credibility here. He always reminds me of that scene from the Wizard of Oz where The Wicked Witch of the West is told to get lost because she has no power in Oz. Steven you have no power here. Begone! Before someone drops a first centur...

Steven Avery wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 10:10 am So your answer is “No”.

With fuzz and buzz.

Let's see....you've now had six years.....and all I've seen are a bunch of assertions.

Incidentally, are you gonna grow a pair and actually debate the Comma Johanneum?
Or will you continue to contribute nothing more than online insults from afar?

Curious. Do you have any writings from Brent Nongbri where he states his definitive position on Codex Sinaiticus? Based on personal palaeographical study. Thanks! I know a whole lot more than you think. (You continue to forget that the academic NT community is very small even worldwide. Your citati...

Steven Avery wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:26 pm Again, all responded to in the Lounge.

Again, you're lying.

It's always amazing to me how often you give the old,"I answered this elsewhere" lie, when you haven't.

Donald. Trump. Of. Textual. Criticism.

But there is a religious significance for eight , though. is a iteration of Isaiah . An eight-fold holy discrepancy is not unusual, or unexpected. Do you have any examples of texts being adjusted based on this "not .. unexpected" significance? And if you do, are they from a much later Byz...