Search found 1170 matches

by Jax
Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:55 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Codex E
Replies: 30
Views: 5127

Re: Codex E

These two pages are interesting. Looks like someone messed up. https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objects/55b2e494-4845-403e-9ba6-d812bda79329/surfaces/a5093cdf-b63e-43a9-97a1-39bf6ec70b1a/# https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objects/55b2e494-4845-403e-9ba6-d812bda79329/surfaces/db6417d5-8c61-4ef8-a0...
by Jax
Fri Jan 14, 2022 1:50 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Christus/Chrestus in the Original Texts
Replies: 62
Views: 16171

Re: Tacitus an Interpolation: Detering Argument

My question is if the diphthong EI can be I or E how do we know that I was meant in the above passages as opposed to E? I don't see any breather marks that would indicate what was intended. Is there something in the text that clues the reader as to what was intended? Or is it simply a rule that is ...
by Jax
Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:23 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Christus/Chrestus in the Original Texts
Replies: 62
Views: 16171

Re: Tacitus an Interpolation: Detering Argument

Also, here is 755 6th from bottom in Codex Bezae
Image

And 756 6th from bottom
Image

The Latin on 756 fully supporting a Christos reading of the Greek on the opposite page.
by Jax
Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:08 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Christus/Chrestus in the Original Texts
Replies: 62
Views: 16171

Re: Tacitus an Interpolation: Detering Argument

Here's 1 Peter 4:16 in Vatacanus 1433 col 3 12th line from bottom XREICTIANOC if anyone is interested.
Image
by Jax
Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:56 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Christus/Chrestus in the Original Texts
Replies: 62
Views: 16171

Re: Tacitus an Interpolation: Detering Argument

The oldest codex is Vaticanus. Yes, it's slightly older than the Sinaiticus perhaps by a few decades and it has ΧΡΕΙΣΤΙΑΝΟΥΣ in Acts 11:26 and ΧΡΕΙΣΤΙΑΝΟΝ in 26:28. Find Vaticanus here . See images 1399 col 1 5th line from bottom and 1422 col 1 line 11. The epsilon-iota combination points to an ear...
by Jax
Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:44 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Christus/Chrestus in the Original Texts
Replies: 62
Views: 16171

Re: Tacitus an Interpolation: Detering Argument

And the earliest copy of Acts 26:28 is in Sinaiticus and is clearly XPHCTIANON ... And here is Acts 11:26 in Sinaiticus also clearly XPHCTIANOY ... So really, the only evidence for Christian for XC is 1 Peter 4:16 in p72 all other examples are either nomina sacra or Chrestian. The information above...
by Jax
Thu Jan 13, 2022 3:13 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Christus/Chrestus in the Original Texts
Replies: 62
Views: 16171

Re: Tacitus an Interpolation: Detering Argument

I really don't see the distinction. XCs obviously thought of themselves as Chrestians with Christian being the exception rather than the rule. If H and I were so interchangeable then it would seem that 1 Peter 4:16 in p72 is an example of a scribe using Iota by mistake, eta being the seemingly prefe...
by Jax
Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:38 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Christus/Chrestus in the Original Texts
Replies: 62
Views: 16171

Christus/Chrestus in the Original Texts

If we're going to discuss what the earliest versions of XC were it would be helpful to see the actual evidence. As far as I know, the earliest copy of Acts 11:26 is in p45 and in that copy we find XPA so that doesn't really help. Though to be fair I am going off of The Text of the Earliest New Testa...
by Jax
Tue Jan 11, 2022 1:09 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Codex E
Replies: 30
Views: 5127

Re: Codex E

These two pages are interesting. Looks like someone messed up. https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objects/55b2e494-4845-403e-9ba6-d812bda79329/surfaces/a5093cdf-b63e-43a9-97a1-39bf6ec70b1a/# https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objects/55b2e494-4845-403e-9ba6-d812bda79329/surfaces/db6417d5-8c61-4ef8-a0...
by Jax
Mon Jan 10, 2022 2:20 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Codex E
Replies: 30
Views: 5127

Re: Codex E

These two pages are interesting. Looks like someone messed up. https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objects/55b2e494-4845-403e-9ba6-d812bda79329/surfaces/a5093cdf-b63e-43a9-97a1-39bf6ec70b1a/# https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objects/55b2e494-4845-403e-9ba6-d812bda79329/surfaces/db6417d5-8c61-4ef8-a0a...