Search found 1349 matches

by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:26 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Great moments in textual transmission.
Replies: 53
Views: 23319

Re: Great moments in textual transmission.

. one of my favourites Matthew, Luke and John indicated that Peter denied Jesus three times before a rooster crowed. Mark however, recorded Jesus’ prophecy as follows: “Assuredly, I say to you that today, even this night, before the rooster crows twice , you will deny me three times”. So does also ...
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:34 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Late dating of Mark: How far would you go? And what are your arguments?
Replies: 43
Views: 14721

Re: The Best Bad Reason To Date The Gospels

. Thanks to everyone who participated so far. The dating by our forum-colleagues is based on (supposed) internal references in GMark to historical events and circumstances (outhouse, Bernard Muller, Stephan Huller, Giuseppe, Charles Wilson, perseusomega9) or references in GMark to other texts as so...
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Sat Oct 24, 2020 10:19 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: A sample of (one of) my issue(s) with the synoptic problem.
Replies: 56
Views: 17170

Re: A sample of (one of) my issue(s) with the synoptic problem.

Bernard Muller wrote:
Sat Oct 24, 2020 9:16 am
Did Farrer or Goodacre address the problem of the differences of material not in gMark and not in the double tradition?
for example Michael Goulder in "Luke: A New Paradigm" via vridar "How and Why Luke Changed Matthew’s Nativity of Jesus Story"
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Fri Oct 23, 2020 11:52 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: A sample of (one of) my issue(s) with the synoptic problem.
Replies: 56
Views: 17170

Re: A sample of (one of) my issue(s) with the synoptic problem.

In other cases, "Luke" or "Matthew" might have merged the wording of the Markan passage with the one of the Q intermediary. I have an example for that: The problematic "Q" and "Mark" overlaps can be explained the same way for the parable of the mustard seed: segments of GMark being rewritten with a...
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Fri Oct 23, 2020 12:44 pm
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: A sample of (one of) my issue(s) with the synoptic problem.
Replies: 56
Views: 17170

Re: A sample of (one of) my issue(s) with the synoptic problem.

So sure, maybe Luke has kept οὖν in his head from Matthew's text (and has added it before ἐν τῇ ἀναστάσει, whereas Matthew has it afterward). Or maybe οὖν, already a favorite both of Matthew and of Luke, is just a pretty logical word to insert at such a juncture. How do we calculate such probabilit...
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Fri Oct 23, 2020 10:46 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: A sample of (one of) my issue(s) with the synoptic problem.
Replies: 56
Views: 17170

Re: A sample of (one of) my issue(s) with the synoptic problem.

So I wind up in this case at a spot I know very, very well: not sure . YMMV. Let me know where I have gone wrong. I also find that the "ὕστερον" is not very meaningful. Luke could have changed that independently of Matthew. imho Marks "ἔσχατον" sounds a little bit apocalyptic. imho the main reason ...
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:57 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Late dating of Mark: How far would you go? And what are your arguments?
Replies: 43
Views: 14721

Re: Late dating of Mark: How far would you go? And what are your arguments?

Not I, but Hermann Detering suggests that Matthew 24.4-5, 23-24 = Mark 13.5-6, 21-22 must refer to Simon bar Kokhba, on the grounds that the latter is the only person "known" to us to have uttered the words, "I am the Christ/Messiah." (He also undertakes the obligatory task of trying to make Matthe...
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:55 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Late dating of Mark: How far would you go? And what are your arguments?
Replies: 43
Views: 14721

Late dating of Mark: How far would you go? And what are your arguments?

. . The starting point of my question is the dating probably prevailing among scholars, namely to the years 69/70 . --> What would be a likely late date or a late terminus ad quem ? How far would you seriously go? --> And what are your arguments ? (Can you give another argument if your main argumen...
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:15 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Minor agreements against gMark
Replies: 61
Views: 24763

Re: Minor agreements against gMark

Finally, if my definition for Q is accepted, the past existence of a Q document does not require "Luke" knowledge of gMatthew, or vice versa. The question is rather whether the old hypothesis is necessary and admissible with regard to the minor agreements that there was a source Q that Matthew and ...
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Sun Oct 18, 2020 4:28 am
Forum: Christian Texts and History
Topic: Minor agreements against gMark
Replies: 61
Views: 24763

Re: Minor agreements against gMark

On my web page on Q http://historical-jesus.info/q.html , I addressed four of these minor agreements, which at the time, were considered the most problematic: Four specific minor agreements between GMatthew and GLuke against GMark are often mentioned as a reason "Luke" knew about Matthew's gospel. ...