Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Mark 1:1 Correct. Mark 3:11 Correct. Mark 5:7 “What do you want with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? correct that YHWH is meant. But what is put on the mouth of a demon hardly can be true. Mark 9:7 “This is my Son, whom I love. Listen to him!” unexpected by YHWH, to place his son against his le...

Ken, can you share the entire Loisy's article? Thank you in advance for any answer.

These two points about washing of feets, request of first seats by Zebedeides are already dealt by Loisy in his History and myth about Jesus Christ , but I would be interested to the Loisy's concession that the birth story in Luke postdates *Ev. If true, that concession would place Occam's Razor dir...

My point is that just as Matthew couldn't be so idiot by meaning litterally the vision of "all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor" (Matthew 4:8) and not at contrary as a satanic mirage, ...i.e. not really a true vision... ...then Loisy shouldn't be so idiot by meaning litterally ...

Prenons le mot de Jésus sur ses vrais parents ( Luc , VIII, 19-21). Couchoud écrit: Pour tenter Jésus et savoir s'il est né, on lui dit: «Ta mère et tes frères se tiennent dehors qui te cherchent». Il répond: Quelle mère, quels frères ai-je, sinon ceux qui écoutent mes paroles et qui les pratiquent...

Mark 10:40: but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant . These places belong to those for whom they have been prepared. ” Alii enim aiunt hoc quod scriptum est, sedere a dextris Salvatoris et sinistris, de Paulo et de Marcione dici, quod Paulus sedet a dextris, Marcio sedeat a sinistris ....

Giuseppe is quoting from this: Couchoud's reply to the Loisy's reply is published in appendix here. https://www.mythicistpapers.com/Couchoud_Creation_2.pdf I have made it clear here: The Couchoud's reply to the Loisy's reply is published in appendix here. https://www.mythicistpapers.com/Couchoud_Cr...

More precisely, Couchoud replies to Loisy as to the Marcion/Luke question in the following way (p. 442-443): I will try to show that, to the four canonical Gospels, there must be added the Gospel of Marcion, now lost but almost completely reconstituted from quotations. M. Loisy assigns it “an inter...

In *Ev, the titulus crucis.

In Mark, the voice from heaven at the baptism and the Parable of the Vineyard.

In Matthew, the birth story.

In Luke, the birth story.

In John, none.

More precisely, Couchoud replies to Loisy as to the Marcion/Luke question in the following way (p. 442-443): I will try to show that, to the four canonical Gospels, there must be added the Gospel of Marcion, now lost but almost completely reconstituted from quotations. M. Loisy assigns it “an interm...