Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

See here:

https://markusvinzent.blogspot.com/2011 ... l-220.html

Cool—-can you tell me how it is even possible to leave the Beatitudes on the cutting room floor? Ev priority over Mark solves a lot of problems, but I just can see anybody taking a razor blade to the Beatitudes. How is that even possible? The Beatitudes are pure marcionite theology: the woes, meant...

RandyHelzerman wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 9:20 am

Giuseppe wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 9:06 am you are talking to a *Ev prioritist,

A prioritist of Ev over Luke, or over Luke and Mark?

over Mark, Matthew and Luke (in that order).

Sometimes it happens to me fear for the life of Carrier when I remember that in America there is free circulation of firearms.

Another evidence of Markan antifeminism and anti-marcionism:

the episode of the Peter’s mother-in-law being healed by Jesus (so that she could "wait on them") was designed to legitimize married apostles (in contrast to Marcionite celibacy).

The woman who washed his feet certainly "got" fact that Jesus was going to die a horrible death, way before the male disciples did. you are talking to a *Ev prioritist, hence I remember that that woman was considered mentally a prostitute by Simon Peter in *Ev. Moving an embarrassed Mark ...

JarekS wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 9:58 pm. It was created in the 19th century by William Benjamin Smith, Arthur Drews and Frederick Engels.

I have a great respect for W. B. Smith and Arthur Drews, and less for Engels and Bruno Bauer. Frankly the quality of the former can't be compared with the latter.

The greatest enemies are the internal enemies in your own camp. The external enemy is the reason for our ennoblement and glory. The enemy within is the cause of our shame. Terribly true. If it's such a terrible truth, why do you describe Marcion with the voice of his bitter enemies? my comment was ...

You should look at Klinghardt more carefully: this a fallacy of the distinction without a real difference. What could be the " good gifts " sent by the Father, if not the " holy spirit " and its benefits? The my points remains all, i.e. that current versions of Canonical Luke ha...

Giuseppe wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 11:01 pm hence showing tolerance to the possibility that the historical Jesus existed. A tolerance that is prohibited by Carrier insofar the epistles are placed in the first century, before the 70 CE.

I would like to add: rightly so.