Search found 7637 matches
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 3:07 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
For you to pretend to limit his expertise suchly, after extolling it repeatedly, is amoral. Your dishonesty is saddening. The more the "moderation" here is biased, the more scholarly progress will occur elsewhere. Consider this a report of biased "moderation"--but you may move i...
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 3:00 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
You haven't even reported any posts.StephenGoranson wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 2:54 pm The more the "moderation" here is biased, the more scholarly progress will occur elsewhere.
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 2:39 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
Take a break. You're not thinking clearly.
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 2:36 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
It seems reasonable to make these distinctions.
Although the question of whether they are both "paleographical" or not is merely semantic.
Although the question of whether they are both "paleographical" or not is merely semantic.
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:51 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
I'm suggesting that "deflection" could characterize how we've gone a whole page without answering this:
Peter Kirby wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:15 am The question becomes which arguments are persuasive that it was:
"a modern, later, anomalous imitation of c.18th-century handwriting"
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:41 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
So you are claiming motive and misrepresenting me to claim that I'm misrepresenting T.
Bravo. Much scholarship.
Bravo. Much scholarship.
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:34 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
Your koans are deflection. I don't know why we're even typing here lol.
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:29 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
What's correct according to you?
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:25 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
If I understand correctly, the "18th century" paleographical conclusion - which could be imitation or genuine - isn't the main concern.
If I understand correctly, paleography does not include the study of whether a hand is instead a deliberate attempt at imitation.
If I understand correctly, paleography does not include the study of whether a hand is instead a deliberate attempt at imitation.
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:15 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 48
- Views: 398
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
The question becomes which arguments are persuasive that it was:
"a modern, later, anomalous imitation of c.18th-century handwriting"
"a modern, later, anomalous imitation of c.18th-century handwriting"