Acts of Paul?
Although I feel like the meme: I'm not sure what makes a Paulinist, and at this point I'm afraid to ask.
Search found 7785 matches
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 11:55 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Is *Ev more paulinist than Mark?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 83
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 7:19 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Every time Paul mentions Mark, he also mentions Luke
- Replies: 17
- Views: 272
Re: Every time Paul mentions Mark, he also mentions Luke
It's kind of exciting--once the Herr Professors can get past the natural aversion to saying that the canonical gospels were based on Christianity's most dangerous heretic, we are going to see a paradigm shift of major proportions. And if we've worked out our (alleged) psychological issues with it a...
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:02 pm
- Forum: Academic Discussion
- Topic: γυμνὸς or γυμνοὶ in Clement's Letter to Theodore?
- Replies: 73
- Views: 2632
Re: γυμνὸς or γυμνοὶ in Clement's Letter to Theodore?
Thanks for sharing the additional images and asking questions on the subject of ligatures. I'm not able to comment on the ligature subject without further study. I'm okay with bracketing the ligature stuff and the accent stuff as beyond my paygrade currently and inconclusive, respectively. I am not ...
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 2:29 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Do all Roads Lead to Eusebius: Antiquities 20.200
- Replies: 14
- Views: 447
Re: Do all Roads Lead to Eusebius: Antiquities 20.200
While the theory that Josephus Antiquities 20.200 has been interpolated may be attractive to mythicists, it is certainly not a solely mythicist argument, if that's what you are suggesting. In the late 19th and the first half of the 20th century it was quite commonly thought to have been interpolate...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 11:47 pm
- Forum: Academic Discussion
- Topic: γυμνὸς or γυμνοὶ in Clement's Letter to Theodore?
- Replies: 73
- Views: 2632
Re: γυμνὸς or γυμνοὶ in Clement's Letter to Theodore?
Thanks Ken!
And thank you to Viklund and Hedrick.
And thank you to Viklund and Hedrick.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:57 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: John the Baptist, redivivus of a 2015 article
- Replies: 122
- Views: 5979
Re: John the Baptist, redivivus of a 2015 article
I wasn't commenting on the other considerations. From the perspective of your outline as a whole, perhaps it's at most a minor flaw. I was commenting specifically on the point where we have in effect excluded the data from the Pallas example, with respect to mentioning someone with reference to anot...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:46 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: John the Baptist, redivivus of a 2015 article
- Replies: 122
- Views: 5979
Re: John the Baptist, redivivus of a 2015 article
And I am really just skeptical that it's even possible to justify the premise mentioned at all. It seems like a major flaw.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:33 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: John the Baptist, redivivus of a 2015 article
- Replies: 122
- Views: 5979
Re: John the Baptist, redivivus of a 2015 article
Most likely a satisfactory answer to that question moves beyond a mechanical search through the text of Josephus. By which I mean that the scope of data considered would have to be wider, not just Josephus, or that the consideration would have to be motivated by some other knowledge by which we can ...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:32 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: John the Baptist, redivivus of a 2015 article
- Replies: 122
- Views: 5979
Re: John the Baptist, redivivus of a 2015 article
I am resting my case specifically on how Josephus uses the two forms of adelphonymics without any apparent exception that I have yet found I understand what you're doing on that level, but you haven't answered the question of how you know that the distinctions that you're making are necessary in yo...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:45 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Every time Paul mentions Mark, he also mentions Luke
- Replies: 17
- Views: 272
Re: Every time Paul mentions Mark, he also mentions Luke
Alternatively, "Luke" was chosen as a pseudonym to counter the tradition of "Mark" being an associate of Paul and involved in writing his gospel (heretical associations). And "Mark" had the association with Paul obscured by an association with Peter.